John Furie Zacharias
having a bad day in a strange place
Thunderstorms Anywhere

Thunderstorms in the Imajica

 The different ways I don't like you 
 in a list that may never become organized
[Search Topics]

[Bush] [Fraggin']
[Iraq] [Conspiracy]
[Florida] [Evil Thumbnails]
[Iran] [Sex]
[NASA] [Movies]
[Politics] [GooTube]
[Media] [TIDGADA]
[Sports] [LBOH]

[Tag Board] [Archives]
<< June 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30

JfZ making a mess of the web
[@twitter] [@facebook]
[@playlist] [@plastic]
[@vodpod] [@zazzle]
[helpforum] [web-litter]
[verissimus] [morphine dreams]
[dark skies] [brilliant weeds]

Phreek-went Phaves
[blogs] [ezines] [rtmfd]
[eye candy] [ear candy]
[mind candy]

[Buy Thunderstorms Gear]
Get Some Effin' Gear

[Supported Causes]

Add to My Yahoo!
[+ favorites]
AddThis Feed Button
rss feed

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Privacy Policy

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Tuesday, June 22, 2004
YCMTSU: Election year Oz brings out brainless Scare Crows again

Don't waste your vote on any Democrat or Republican
The nipple seen 'round the world
Let's see ... there was Dorothy, Toto, the Cowardly Lion, the Tin Man, and the Scare Crow.  It seems that Nebraska, not Kansas, simply must elect Scare Crows in need of a brain to the U.S. Senate.  It was Nebraska Senator James Exon who frightened the technophobic christians of the country by telling them that, "the worst, most vile, most perverse pornography is only a few 'click, click, clicks' away from any child on the Internet" and sponsored the Communications Decency Act to be part of the huge, sweeping Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996.  Perhaps because Exon was a Democrat, Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had reservations about Exon's CDA but, he was obviously astute to the political game when he commented, "Clearly a violation of free speech and it's a violation of the right of adults to communicate with each other, but was I think seen as a good press release back home so people voted for it."

Both of these quotes are from the same transcript of the respected PBS show, McNeil Lehrer News Hour, sent out by Shabbir Safdar of the Voter's Telecom Watch (VTW).  Some of you may remember me going ballistic back in 1995 and 1996 over Exon's CDA and all of its subsequent legislative permutations.  I still have packets from Michigan's legislators.  Imajica BBS became the anti-CDA coordination point for the VTW for the state of Michigan and we may have helped Senator Carl Levin to check his pair and vote against it.  Regardless, you need only to scan the titles on this Electronic Frontier Foundation archive page to see how many lawsuits and court battles that the brainless, unconstitutional legislation caused back in the d-a-y.

Fast forward now to the present election season.  Once again, a Scare Crow Nebraska Senator sponsors another smarmy 'protect the children' amendment.  According to a Reuters News article,

"The U.S. Senate on Tuesday approved a measure to crack down on indecency antics on broadcast radio and television by sharply raising fines to as much as $275,000 per incident and up to $3 million per day."

In a Cowardly Lion move, the Senate passed this amendment by slipping it into the upcoming defense authorization bill.  While the House still has to pass it, and someone in the White House has to sneak into Dick Cheney's desk and borrow his Dubya stamp pad, it's likely to become law of the land.  No one is going to commit political suicide by voting against any defense related bill during this election year.  Besides, who cares ... it's just extra fines against big, rich, liberal media conglomerates, right?  You'll care when they start dumbing down radio content so far you'll be treated to Clear Channel playing that annoying Barney the Dinosaur song during your commute home after a particularly stressful day at work.

Once again, as citizens of this country, we are also treated to cowardly, brainless politicians who want to legislate our morality and take the heart out of the constitution for the sake of their own careers.

And what do you think is behind the wizard's curtain in Washington, O.Z.?  Sadly, it's just the floppy middle-aged breast of Janet Jackson.

You Can't Make This Shit Up

Posted at 07:15 am by John Furie Zacharias

June 24, 2004   10:14 PM PDT
I gotta say, I agree with finding a way to make it more difficult to access pornography and keep radio and TV (broadcast) clean but...this is not the way. Also, this is yet another stepping stone to total government regulated media. Parents MUST take a FULLY active role in their childrens lives not only by monitoring what they watch, listen to and surf but by regulating the time spent on these activities and SPENDING THAT TIME WITH THEIR CHILDREN! That IMHO is a much better solution than the government sticking it's nose where it doesn't belong.
June 25, 2004   05:14 AM PDT
Good advice. Then again, I was a virgin until I was 16 ;)

BAC parents must have it rough ... I mean, like all parents, they have a desire to protect their children from the big bad world out there and let them be innocent little cherubs for as long as possible ... but over-protecting and sheltering kids for too long can be a disaster, too. It's a fine line to tread.
June 25, 2004   05:04 PM PDT
A fine line to tread? Well if you are comparing sheltering them to spending time with them I have to disagree. Sheltering them from all outside influence is a bad idea but spending as much time with them as you can is a proven way to help them become productive and valuable members of society who respect authority and don't go around breaking the law. Plus you will have children who love you (and their siblings), not hate you. My sisters kids are a prime example...they are homeschooled but have plenty of social interaction through church and friends...they are some of the smartest, most respectful and polite kids I've ever known, not to say they are perfect, they do still get into trouble but not very often and when they do they UNDERSTAND that what they did was wrong and accept the punishment without much fuss. Basically parents need to stop letting schools, society and TV raise their children, step up to the plate and be an adult...TAKE CARE OF YOUR OWN CHILDREN! It's not anyone elses responsibility but your own and how they turn out is a direct reflection on YOU and the way YOU raised them! If they are unwanted by you then put them up for adoption, there are plenty of loving married couples who are waiting for the chance to have a child but are unable to have their own.
June 26, 2004   02:36 AM PDT
I didn't mean to suggest that spending time with your kids was sheltering them.

Spending time with them is what I was saying was 'good advice'. They need someone around to (hopefully) explain to them the various things about which they have questions, too.
June 27, 2004   10:25 PM PDT
Ok guys stop fighting. I have known people that where sheltered as children and when they became of age they went hog wild. That is what JFZ was saying about being over protective of your kids. You have to be to a point but then again you also have to let them live and learn.
June 28, 2004   09:48 PM PDT
A good point to be sure Helleena but my point was very similar. I was trying to point out that parents need to take interest in their childrens lives and not let society raise them...this is not even close to keeping them sheltered from the real world nor does it prevent them from living and learning from their own mistakes it simply shows them that their parents love them enough to take time out of their lives to help guide them through life which is the foundation of a parents role. Besides, we're not fighting, simply debating and's what we do, it's how we communicate, get to know each other better and become better friends.
June 29, 2004   01:52 AM PDT
Yea you are right Duke. But you also know that most parents just don't care. They think that they are doing right by thier kids but in the end they are not.
also you are right that this is a good way to get to know eachother by debating these kind of things. later

Leave a Comment:


Homepage (optional)


Bookmark and Share

Previous Entry Home Next Entry